Departamento de
Traducción e Interpretación

BITRA. BIBLIOGRAFÍA DE INTERPRETACIÓN Y TRADUCCIÓN

 
Volver
 
Tema:   Legal. Técnico. Género. Brasil. Estados Unidos.
Autor:   Delvizio, Ivanir Azevedo
Año:   2011
Título:   Tradução juramentada de documentos escolares: português: questões culturais, terminológicas e tradutórias [Sworn translation of academic documents: Portuguese: cultural, terminological and translational issues]
Lugar:   São José do Rio Preto (São Paulo) https://repositorio.unesp.br/bitstream/handle/11449/100106/delvizio_ia_dr_sjrp.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Editorial/Revista:   Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
Páginas:   388
Idioma:   Portugués.
Tipo:   Tesis.
Disponibilidad:   Acceso abierto
Resumen:   Academic documents are a frequent object of Sworn Translation work. This study, funded by the FAPESP, purports to: (1) provide a comparative study of the Brazilian and US educational systems; (2) identify and analyze the terms in English found in academic documents translated from Portuguese into English which are submitted to the process of sworn translation; (3) determine their equivalents in Portuguese; (4) set up an English ? Portuguese dictionary of the relevant terms used in academic documents; and (5) determine the prevailing level of terminological equivalence between the academic terminology employed in the United States as compared to Brazil. Our investigation crisscrosses the domains of Bilingual Terminology and Translation and takes as a starting point a comparable corpus comprising the following set of documents: CDETJ- PI (set of school documents submitted to sworn translation from Portuguese into English), CDEOI (set of original school documents in English), CDEOP (set of original school documents in Portuguese) and CDETJ-IP (set of school documents submitted to sworn translation from English into Portuguese). These texts were excerpted from Books of Sworn Translation Records, made available by three Brazilian sworn translators. Data in English and Portuguese were organized in terminological records, which allowed us to compare the semantic content of terms in English and their possible equivalents in Portuguese. From the 123 terms selected in English, 35 (28.5%) did not have equivalents in Portuguese, the cases of equivalence were predominant. In relation to the terminological gaps, we verified in CDETJ-IP the solutions adopted by sworn translators. [Source: Author]
Agradecimientos:   Record supplied by Katia Aily Franco de Camargo (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN).
 
 
2001-2019 Universidad de Alicante DOI: 10.14198/bitra
Comentarios o sugerencias
La versión española de esta página es obra de Javier Franco
Nueva búsqueda
European Society for Translation Studies Ministerio de Educación Ivitra : Institut Virtual Internacional de Traducció asociación ibérica de estudios de traducción e interpretación